Post by bozakPost by slumpyAfter years of waiting for a sensible reply to a Usenet post, the best
As an outsider, it makes quite interesting reading - has the US public
conveniently forgotten this bulge because there was no conclusive or
believable answer ? It would appear so from here - the media have been
duped, confused and left scratching their heads, while the campaign just
carries on.
Maybe that's it - cannot understand it, pretend it didn't happen....
uhhh no, the media is owned by rightwinged bigots like rupert
murdoch, or you could look at cbs which is owned by viacom
whose president is an avid bush supporter, or GE who makes
a lot of war product and owns nbc...
Read at the bottom what this reporter says about the bulge story:
Is Bush wired AND hiding a health problem?
Sat. October 30: Just released
http://bulgegate.blogspot.com
.....
Don't know the story? Get up to speed:
Would you be upset if Bush failed to disclose something critically important
to you?
President Bush has a bulge on his back. It's been called "Bulgegate" and the
"The Bush Bulge" and it has appeared in all of the 2004 Presidential
debates. The "bulge" has been called a "badly tailored shirt" which the
President claims to have worn in all 3 debates, mind you.
The "3 bad shirts theory" is to the media, it seems, acceptable: the
President has a wardrobe full of bad expensive shirts! We have an obvious
bulge, so do we have a transmitter, defibrillator, or something else?
There are also two wires-like objects found on President Bush. Links are
which lead to more information regarding the "bulge". Are the "bulges" and
"wires" connected in some way?
These insights have compelled me to ask in my latest article: could it be a
defibrillator? The President has a genetic disposition to AF (read study)
and has not submitted for a physical this year which goes against tradition.
Why has the President not submitted for a physical?
Read the entire article here: http://bulgegate.blogspot.com
........................................
BULGEGATE UPDATE -- http://bulgegate.blogspot.com
........................................
The "Bulge-gate" news story has gotten a lot of attention, largely being
supported by the suspicion President Bush was wearing an earpiece in the
debates. To support this theory we have seen a bulge on his back, past
evidence of earpiece use, a wire under his tie, and strange speech patterns.
Bush could be "wired" and also have a health problem because 2 relevant
tracks of evidence have consistently appeared. I am going to publish
another photo soon to demonstrate that if the Bulge on Bush's back was a
communications device, it was big. If it was something else, we need to
know what it is.
I don't suspect many believe it is only a health related issue happening
here, I certainly don't. Bush could actually be both "wired" and have had a
medical device on, nothing has made this impossible so far, although
statistically less likely.
I wanted to restate the defibrillator case to keep all options alive as long
as there is evidence to support it. That increases the chances of important
information coming forward.
.......................................
Cannonfire (also of note are the articles about potential voter fraud)
continues to publish almost daily on the evolution of the Bulge story,
noting:
"The bulge-spotters' argument may be better served if we keep these pictures
as far as possible from the Adobe treatment. Any use of Photoshop, however
innocent in intention, allows Bush apologists to howl that evil librul
hoaxters concocted the entire controversy."
This is a good point, and as the evidence builds that sentiment will become
reinforced. These techniques need to be used carefully and to enhance
evidence, not generate it.
http://cannonfire.blogspot.com/2004/10/bulge-spotting-new-national-sport.html
.......................................
BushWired has updated its extensive archive of links, evidence, comments and
news articles. See the latest:
http://www.bushwired.blogspot.com
.......................................
Finally Chris Suellentrop (deputy Washington bureau chief for Slate.com), is
interviewed on WNYC's radio show "On the Media":
http://www.wnyc.org/onthemedia/transcripts/transcripts_101504_bulge.html
Excerpts:
"
BROOKE GLADSTONE: So where is most of the coverage of this mysterious bulge
coming from?
CHRIS SUELLENTROP: There was speculation about this in 2000, believe it or
not....
...
BROOKE GLADSTONE: And what's your answer?
CHRIS SUELLENTROP: I think it's definitely a story to write about [...] I
think the press obviously missed the Swiftboat story for a long time [...]
I've never seen a, a wrinkle in somebody's clothes that came out as a
rectangle. [LAUGHTER] So, you know, I think it's a real question.
...
BROOKE GLADSTONE: Do you think the internet is helping reporters to get to
the bottom of this, or is it having the effect of discrediting the whole
story from the outset?
CHRIS SUELLENTROP: [...] the idea that there was a rectangle on the
president's back became obscured by the fact that all these left-wing
bloggers were saying "the president is wired," which was sort of a leap
unsupported by the evidence, and so then people immediately dismissed the
rectangle and said this whole thing is phony; [...] Now, having said that,
without them -- would we be talking about it? I don't know. It's a good
question.
...
BROOKE GLADSTONE: So the White House would like it to go away. Do you think
reporters would also like it to go away?
CHRIS SUELLENTROP: Probably. I mean look, I think reporters want to set the
agenda and not have the agenda set for them, and for better or for worse, if
they feel like they've gotten pushed to this story and they don't think it's
worthy of covering, it's the kind of thing they want to go away.
...
BROOKE GLADSTONE: [...] Do you find that a lot of mainstream reporters are
using the excuse of covering the coverage to cover the story?
CHRIS SUELLENTROP: That's right. Now it's covering the blogs or covering the
buzz on the internet. So you can say well, we're not giving credence to this
story -- we're just covering what people are chatting about on line. And
some of the people that have sat out the story have said, look, we don't
want to do that story.
"
.....................................
A few days ago photo enhancements exposes a wire leading from the bulge on
the President's back, Salon.com has also published on the same topic. Read
both accounts here:
http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2004/10/29/bulge/index_np.html
http://bulgegate.blogspot.com (test the theory for yourself!)
...
http://www.blueoregon.com/2004/10/bush_busted_by_.html
Says: "Well, now it appears that one of the most respected scientists in the
photo analysis field has determined conclusively: Bush had some sort of
artificial device under his coat."
...
Puppetstring has been updated with a comment I grabbed from Colin Green at:
http://www.journalscape.com/Colin/2004-10-29-11:02
"
If we follow this theory through the bulge would be the receiver/relayer,
the wire up the right shoulder is to an inductance loop, perhaps in his
collar, and it also looks to me that there is a wire traveling down his
back, which would correspond to the wire seen behind his tie. This wire that
we can see is actually quite prominent by way of its thickness, say 5mm.
Such thickness would only normally be used to convey power - from a battery
pack somewhere on his person, to the receiver on his back. Also note that
the tie wire disappears into the left hand side of Bush's jacket - the same
side as the wire seen own his lower back.
"
Go to and scroll to the bottom:
http://puppetstring.blogspot.com/2004/10/was-there-wire-behind-that-tie_23.html#comments
'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
Something to remember:
http://img44.exs.cx/my.php?loc=img44&image=badtailor.jpg
READ MORE HERE:
http://www.bushwired.blogspot.com
http://www.bushbulge.com (send an automatic letter to the media)
http://www.puppetstring.blogspot.com
http://cannonfire.blogspot.com
http://bulgegate.blogspot.com
http://isbushwired.com
...
http://politicalcommentator.blogspot.com
...
'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
